It is said in certain philosophical and scientific
circles that you are on the path to truth when you can reduce the subject under
study to its most simple form. The expression of this idea is the very
definition of Ockham's Razor. This level of thought is where axioms are formed,
answers to problems occur, and things become really obvious. Over the years
I've given some thought to the philosophical principles of socialism and all
that it implies. The reasons for this, given the current path of the United
States, should be clear. Also for the sake of clarity, what I'm talking about
is the idea, "from each according to his ability, to each according to his
need," and all forms of government that form around it.
Socialism is simple and predictable.
No matter the country or the specifics of the form it
always requires four things. The first is the consideration that it is
perfectly okay for large groups of people to take what they want from small
groups of people. The second is a promise of financial equality between economic
groups and thus everybody will be taken care of between the classes of people. The
third is a government, with power over the lives of the people, to
enforce the first two by law. The fourth is a population gullible enough to
believe that if they give power over to someone else, they themselves
will benefit from it.
The predictability of the eventual outcome lies in the
simple facts of human nature. People—while having equal rights—are not equal in
talent, and thus resent the enforcement of equality, and so when confronted
with it will just stop trying to excel or support the system with their
inherent abilities. People also naturally resent other people who wield power over them. Additionally, no matter how sincere the expressed efforts of the
government promising financial equality and care for all, sooner or later some
real tyrant will gain control of the power over the people and take
advantage of them. Thus two things will almost always happen sooner or later.
First, the government will be unable to provide what they promised, leading to huge
social upheaval. Second, a lot of people will die in the social upheaval.
All conversations regarding socialism, or redistribution
of wealth, or fairness, or leveling the playing field, or taking care of the poor, elderly or children, or any of the resulting consequences, fall somewhere
in those two paragraphs. The first paragraph, regardless of the specifics, is
how and why a country adopts socialism. The second paragraph, regardless of the
specifics, is how and why it always results in the same thing.
You could break it down as thus and call it the Ten
Principles of Socialism:
1) The consideration that it is perfectly okay for large
groups of people to take what they want from small groups of people.
2) The promise of financial equality between economic
groups and thus everybody will be taken care of between the classes of people.
3) The government, with power over the lives of
the people, to enforce the first two by law.
4) The population gullible enough to believe that if they
give power over to someone else, they themselves will benefit from it.
5) The predictability of the eventual outcome lies in the
simple facts of human nature.
6) People—while having equal rights—are not equal in
talent, and thus resent the enforcement of equality, and so when confronted
with it will just stop trying to excel or support the system with their
inherent abilities.
7) People naturally resent other people who wield power over them.
8) No matter how sincere the expressed efforts of the
government promising financial equality and care for all, sooner or later some
real tyrant will gain control of the power over the people and take
advantage of them.
9) The government will be unable to provide what they
promised, leading to huge social upheaval.
10) A lot of people will die in the social upheaval when it all goes wrong.
So there you go. Right there are the ten principles of
socialism. There is nothing more to say about it because there is nothing else
that can be said about it. Anything a person thinks is an exception to any of
the above, or anything supposedly new about it, is merely regurgitating one or
more of the above in different words.
Don't trust me on this. Look at any conversation
regarding philosophical socialism and see for yourself that all that can be
said about it falls under those ten things in some way or another.
